May we be astute in parsing the core values and message of a belief system, recognizing that often the actions of some who claim to be adherents are not representative of the core values or message.  May we also be astute in discerning the fervor and depth of commitment from certain actionable expressions.  Zealotry does not necessarily equate hostility. Holding up fundamentals does not necessarily give rise to fundamentalism. 

Religion has been berated because of the behaviors of those who misapply its message.  

While the dominant culture in the Western world has witnessed atrocities in the name of religion for centuries and now promotes tolerance, the irony is that tolerance falls far short of the aim of the religions that are often despised because of the violence done in their name--instead of tolerance, they require the faithful to love.  Tolerance says "I will allow you to exist and express yourself as long as I am not affected."  Love says "I will feed you, shelter you, clothe you, bless you, engage you, celebrate you, welcome you, even defend you against those who would do you harm--not because you agree with me, but because it is the right thing to do."

Most major religions contain a common DNA that gives rise to a broad and expansive interest in peace, justice, and love.  Those who are faithful in any religious tradition are those who practice gentleness, kindness, generosity, compassion, and hospitality toward everyone--even those who are a threat.  Those who fall short of such faithfulness should not be the primary definition or measurement, or used to determine the veracity of the belief system.  

Violence in the name of religion or faith is unquestionably wrong.  Let's not compound that wrong by accusing all adherents to a religion--or religion in general--as culpable in the misuse of religion.

© Stephen Carl